GraphQL vs REST - A Detailed Comparison of APIs

Introduction

APIs or Application Programming Interfaces are a major part of modern web and mobile applications. APIs enable different systems to talk to one another, get, and share information with ease. Two of the most popular types of APIs used today are REST (Representational State Transfer) and GraphQL.

Both REST and GraphQL serve the same purpose: allowing clients to interact with servers, but they do so in very different ways. REST utilizes a lot of endpoints and is based on HTTP, whereas GraphQL has a single endpoint and queries, allowing developers more control over the way they fetch data.

In this GraphQL vs REST comparison, we'll explore the key differences between these two API approaches and why you might choose one over the other based on your project needs.

What is REST API?

REST (Representational State Transfer) is an architectural style for designing web services that use HTTP methods to interact with resources. It was introduced by Roy Fielding in 2000 as a scalable and standardized way to structure APIs. REST APIs allow clients (such as web or mobile applications) to send requests to a server and receive structured responses, usually in JSON or XML format.

How REST API Works

REST APIs follow a stateless client-server model, meaning each request from a client contains all the necessary information for the server to process it. There is no session or state stored by the server between requests.

Key Features of REST API:

1. Resources: Everything in REST is referred to a "resource" (e.g., users, posts, products).
2. Endpoints: You can access each resource by a special URL (e.g., /users, /posts).
3. HTTP Methods: RESTful APIs utilize normal HTTP operations to get things done:
   • GET → Retrieve data (e.g., GET /users)
   • POST → Create a new resource (e.g., POST /users)
   • PUT/PATCH → Update an existing resource (e.g., PUT /users/1)
   • DELETE → Remove a resource (e.g., DELETE /users/1)

Example of REST API

Let's say we have a blog website. Here’s how REST API would fetch a list of blog:

Fetching all blog posts:

1GET /blogs
2
3// fetch all blogs data
4[  
5  { "id": 1, "title": "GraphQL vs REST API", "author": "Jane" },  
6  { "id": 2, "title": "Guide to React Query", "author": "John" }  
7]  

Fetching a single post:

1GET /blogs/1
2
3// fetch single blog data of id: 1
4[  
5  { "id": 1, "title": "GraphQL vs REST API", "author": "Jane" },
6]  

Creating a new post:

1POST /blogs
2
3// This will create a new blog post
4
5Content-Type: application/json
6{
7  "id": "3",
8  "title": "SSR vs SSG in NextJS",
9  "author": "Depp"
10}

Deleting a post:

1DELETE /posts/1 
2
3// This will delete the post of id: 1

REST API Pros & Cons

Pros:

• Simple and widely adopted.
• Easy to cache responses using HTTP caching.
• Works well with microservices and stateless applications.

Cons:

• Over-fetching & under-fetching: Clients may receive more or less data than needed.
• Multiple requests needed: Multiple endpoints have to be called separately for complex data.
• Less flexibility: Predefined data structures are returned by fixed endpoints.

While choosing between GraphQL vs REST, if you require more flexibility and would like to prevent multiple requests, GraphQL could be a better choice

What is GraphQL?

GraphQL is a query language for APIs and a runtime environment for executing those queries. It was developed by Facebook in 2012 and released as an open-source project in 2015. Unlike REST, which uses multiple endpoints to access different resources, GraphQL allows you to interact with a single endpoint and fetch exactly the data you need with one request. That flexibility is what makes GraphQL so special and why it has gained popularity among developers.

GraphQL provides a more efficient and flexible alternative to REST by enabling clients to request exactly the data they need, no more, no less. It can be used with any backend service, allowing developers to create more powerful, optimized APIs.

How GraphQL Works

GraphQL enables clients to query multiple resources in a single request. It uses a single endpoint to handle all interactions, and the client has complete control over the structure of the response.

Key Features of GraphQL:

1. Queries: A request to fetch data from the server. The client specifies exactly what data is needed.
2. Mutations: A request to change data on the server, similar to POST, PUT, or DELETE in REST.
3. Subscriptions: A way to listen for real-time updates on data (e.g., live notifications or chat messages).
4. Schemas & Types: A schema defines the structure of the data (types of fields and relationships between them) that can be queried.
5. Resolvers: Functions on the server that handle queries and mutations and return the requested data.

Example: GraphQL in Action

Here’s a simple example of GraphQL:

Fetching Data (Query):

Send a “query” describing exactly what data you want.

1query {
2user(id: "123") {
3  name
4  email
5  posts(limit: 3) {
6    title
7    likes
8  }
9}
10}

The server responds with only the requested fields:

1{
2"user": {
3  "name": "John",
4  "email": "john@example.com",
5  "posts": [
6    { "title": "GraphQL API", "likes": 150 },
7    { "title": "REST vs GraphQL", "likes": 200 }
8  ]
9}
10}

Pros & Cons of GraphQL

Pros:

• Exact Data: Clients fetch only the data they need, avoiding over-fetching or under-fetching. -** Single Endpoint**: All requests (queries, mutations, and subscriptions) are made through one endpoint, simplifying the API.
• Flexibility: Allows clients to query for complex and related data in a single request.
• Real-Time Updates: GraphQL subscriptions enable real-time data fetching, which is ideal for chat apps, live updates, etc.

Cons:

• Learning Curve: Takes a little extra effort to learn how GraphQL is done, particularly the schema and resolvers.
• Caching Challenges: Because everything passes through a single endpoint, caching is more complicated than REST's simple HTTP-based caching.
• Complexity: If you have an extremely large schema, queries can get complicated, which can result in performance problems.

By providing full flexibility and control over data fetching, GraphQL is changing the way developers build APIs. Now that you know what GraphQL is and how it works, let's get into an in-depth GraphQL vs REST comparison to determine which one you should use for your future project!

Learn More About Data Fetching in ReactJS via React Query

Key Differences: GraphQL vs REST

When choosing between GraphQL and REST, it’s important to understand their core differences in how they work, their pros, and their cons. While both architectures are designed to facilitate communication between clients and servers, they do so in very distinct ways. The following is a comprehensive GraphQL vs REST comparison in various aspects.

1. Architecture & Endpoints

REST:

• REST APIs are based on multiple endpoints. Each resource (e.g., user, post, comment) usually has a dedicated URL (e.g., /users, /posts, /comments), and each endpoint corresponds to a specific action (e.g., GET, POST, PUT, DELETE).
• The server responds with a fixed structure, often returning all the data for that resource.

GraphQL:

• GraphQL uses a single endpoint (typically /graphql) to handle all types of requests—queries, mutations, and subscriptions.
• The client sends a query to the server specifying the exact data it needs, and the server responds with only the requested data, in the exact format requested.

2. Data Fetching & Over-Fetching

REST:

-** Over-fetching**: A client may request more data than it needs, as REST responses are typically predefined. For example, fetching a list of users may also return unnecessary fields like timestamps or metadata.

• Under-fetching: On the other hand, a client might require more information that is not present in one response and has to issue multiple requests (e.g., retrieving user information and then issuing a second request for their posts).

GraphQL:

• Accurate Data Fetching: GraphQL solves this problem by allowing clients to request exactly the data they need. For example, if a client only needs the name of a user, it can specify that in the query, avoiding over-fetching.
• Single Request: Multiple related resources (e.g., posts and comments for a user) can be fetched in a single query, minimizing multiple requests.

3. Flexibility & Customization

REST:

• REST APIs return predefined data structures based on the server's design. If the client needs additional data or different fields, it often requires modifications to the API or multiple calls to different endpoints.
• Less flexibility: Clients are somewhat limited by the server-side structure of the API.

GraphQL:

• Highly Flexible: With GraphQL, clients can define the structure of the response. They can request only specific fields, combine multiple resources in a single query, and even perform multiple actions (like fetching a user’s posts and comments) in one request.
• Dynamic Queries: GraphQL queries are dynamic, which means the client can adjust them to fit the exact requirements at any time without needing to modify the server or endpoints.

4. Performance & Efficiency

REST:

• Multiple Requests: If an app needs data from several resources, REST requires multiple calls to different endpoints, which can increase latency and network overhead. This is especially problematic in mobile applications with limited bandwidth.
• Over-fetching and under-fetching of data can also reduce the overall performance and increase the complexity of handling server responses.

GraphQL:

• Optimized for Performance: By allowing the client to request only the necessary data in a single query, GraphQL reduces the number of network requests and optimizes data transfer.
• Nested Data: With GraphQL, complex, nested data structures can be fetched in a single query, reducing latency and the need for multiple round-trips to the server.

When to Use REST vs GraphQL?

• When to use REST API:

  • You need a simple API with known endpoints.
  • You’re working with microservices or static data.
  • Caching is a priority for better performance.

• Use GraphQL when:

  • You need flexibility to fetch only the data you need.
  • Your app has complex data relationships and multiple resources.
  • You require real-time updates or optimized data fetching.

Both REST and GraphQL have their unique strengths, so the selection is primarily dependent on the project's particular requirements!

GraphQL vs REST - Tools/Libraries

Both GraphQL and REST have a wide range of tools and libraries designed to streamline development, improve functionality, and make integration easier. Below are some of the most common and useful tools and libraries for both GraphQL and REST.

REST Tools & Libraries

• Axios: Commonly used to interact with REST APIs by sending HTTP requests (GET, POST, PUT, DELETE, etc.) and handling responses in JavaScript applications.
• Fetch API: Used to interact with RESTful APIs in the browser or Node.js, offering a simple and more powerful alternative to XMLHttpRequest.
• Swagger: Helps to design and document REST APIs, making it easy for developers to visualize and test endpoints.
• Postman: Frequently used for API testing, Postman allows developers to send HTTP requests, examine responses, and perform different actions like creating collections for repeated tasks.
• Express.js (Node.js): Commonly used to build RESTful APIs and web applications with Node.js, enabling quick development of server-side code.

GraphQL Tools & Libraries

• Apollo Client: Used to fetch data from a GraphQL server and cache the results for efficient data retrieval.
• Apollo Server: Provides an easy-to-setup server for creating a GraphQL API.
• GraphQL.js: Used to define GraphQL schemas, handle queries and mutations, and build custom resolvers.
• Prisma: Often used in GraphQL API backends to connect with databases and manage data operations.

Learn More About Data Fetching in ReactJS via React Query

Frequently Asked Questions

• Q: GraphQL vs REST, Which one is better?

  A: It depends on your project needs. GraphQL is ideal for applications that require dynamic and efficient data fetching, especially with complex relationships. REST is better suited for simple, resource-based applications where multiple endpoints and data structures are well-defined.

• Q: When should I use REST APIs over GraphQL?

  A: You should use REST when you have a well-defined set of endpoints and your application requires simple CRUD operations.

• Q: Can GraphQL replace REST entirely?

  A: While GraphQL can replace REST in many cases, there are still scenarios where REST is a better fit. For example, if your API is simple and doesn’t involve complex relationships or data retrieval, REST can be more straightforward.

• Q: Are there any performance differences between GraphQL and REST?

  A: GraphQL can be more efficient for fetching related data in a single request, reducing over-fetching. However, REST can perform better for simple, static data requests, as it avoids the complexity of query parsing and execution.

Conclusion

In conclusion, both GraphQL and REST offer unique advantages and are suited for different types of applications. GraphQL vs REST comes down to the specific needs of your project. GraphQL shines in scenarios where you need to fetch complex data structures in a single request, offering greater flexibility, efficiency, and a dynamic approach to data fetching. On the other hand, REST is a time-tested and straightforward approach that works perfectly for applications with well-defined resources and where simplicity and ease of use are key.

The choice between GraphQL vs REST depends on the specific needs of your project. If you’re building a data-intensive application with complex relationships and dynamic queries, GraphQL may be the better choice. However, if your application revolves around simple CRUD operations with defined endpoints, REST could be a more suitable option.

Both technologies have their place in modern development, and in some cases, they can be used together, allowing you to take advantage of the strengths of each. Whichever you choose, understanding the core differences and use cases will help you make an informed decision that benefits your project in the long run.

If you found this article helpful, feel free to share it with others who may benefit from it!

Share this article